Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark W**a" data-source="post: 151019" data-attributes="member: 1196">It's your decision and choice how you want to do it.  All I know is, I went from 30th (well 24th once corrected, see above post) to like 87th (probably around 77th once corrected) which is fine however I don't feel it's fair that I'm behind a guy whose "best scores" are in the 30th-60th range.  One of his scores listed, Twilight Zone at 64th, is a table I happen to be 52nd on.  But I don't even consider that one of my top scores at all.  Even my 35th on CV is shakey.  How can someone like that be ranked above someone with 4 top 10 scores?  Doesn't seem fair to me, seems like it must favor those with a ton of tables, which I thought we were trying to get away from?Ok.  I figured.These are my stats ivitro in case you missed them:BR: 1stFT: 3rdAFM: 3rdToM: 7th MM: 17th CV: 35thTwilight Zone: 50th</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 54 (members: 0, guests: 54)