Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="invitro" data-source="post: 151035" data-attributes="member: 446">The log method in the table uses POINTS = 100 * (1 - log(RANK)/log(500)), instead of having the log(104.76) from the earlier table.  This pegs #500 to 0 points; the other pegs #100 to 1 point.  Inspector42 has lots of scores in the #101-500 range, and #154 is worth 19 points with the log(500) version, so that's how he racks up over 500 total.I used log(500) for the one I posted because I thought (maybe incorrectly) that's the one you preferred.  %-)  Inspector42 is ranked #286 when using POINTS = max(0, 100 * (1 - log(RANK)/log(104.76))), and #348 with the exp function.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 54 (members: 0, guests: 54)