Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans - please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on Facebook and Twitter

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fromduc" data-source="post: 151051" data-attributes="member: 4175">Mark, u got points on only 9 tables out of 45 or so, i think that explains a lot of things, when Invitro will take only the best 50% of tables u should have a better place here.And about all the formulas, i think the log one that Erik proposed is far too severe (the exp one was already for me, if i had to chose on the numbers u gave i would take the power one, which is already givin a solid enough bonus to the top 10-5. Erik i can understand ur log formula would be better to determine who's the best between u and Anton, or maybe inside the top 5, but after for me it's just meaningless for everybody out of top 10. For u and maybe the 4-5 people who are really on top 10 everywhere it would be cool, but by definition u're only half a dozen to be in this case.And again, i know i'm kind of the only one here to defend this line here, but for me a double 10th on 2 tables HAS to be rewarded better than a guy who is 1st on one table and far away on the second one. I dont understand why as Mark said a player who's present everywhere in top 50 would be seen as "he just had a lot of time to play all the tables" and why u would reaward better a guy who "played one table until death" to be 1st. I think the 50% of tables methode which will be implemented next time is far enough fair for this kind of people <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 150 (members: 0, guests: 150)