Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark W**a" data-source="post: 151084" data-attributes="member: 1196">No method of ranking will ever be perfect.However, it should most certainly not favor quantity over quality.I really don't feel the need to ahem " compete" with guys scoring 40-50 spots below me on tables. I'm sorry but a rank of 40th or 50th on a table is mediocre in a list ranking the worlds best.Twilight Zone is my weakest table, one I need a lot of improvement on and need to learn more about in order to get better on. I'm 52nd on it. Cirqus Voltaire is a table I've been trying to get better on. I'm 35th. Those are -ok- scores but extremely far from the top.I understand that there should be a balance between skill and number of tables. There is something to be said for someone who is pretty good at nearly all tables. But there is also something to be said for someone who takes the time to master a table, versus just "paying to win", buying all the tables and playing the less popular ones to pad thier rank.If I need to do that to "compete" then just forget it, and I ask that my name politely be removed from the ranks as I chose not to participate in a system like that.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 142 (members: 0, guests: 142)