Reply to thread

So if u like specific example, to take the other one i gave, do u think it's normal that a guy who is 1st on a table and less than 100th on 7 others has a better rank than a one who is 20th on the 8 same tables? If yes i'm a bit surprised, as u were telling a couple of weeks ago u were thinking to change the formula because the exp formula was making too severes gaps, and now u like this PAPA's one which give very more severe gaps.