Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans - please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on Facebook and Twitter

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="invitro" data-source="post: 151465" data-attributes="member: 446">I think this example should be 20th on 7 (not 8) tables <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />.Ok, no, I agree that 20th on 7 tables should ranked higher than 1st on 1 table, well, maybe.  If both players already have several top-30 scores, then adding a #1 score seems better than adding seven #20 scores.  So actually, I'm not sure if I agree or not.The exp-formula top 100, with only a player's top 23 tables counted, is still my "official" one.I will wait a few days for feedback before doing anything else.  I think I might actually make a poll to choose between the methods.  For each possible method (exp, log on 500 players, log on 100 players, linear, IFPA, maybe another if someone gives an explicit formula), I would post the top 100 as calculated by that method.  But I would only give the ranks of the scores each player got, not their username.  Then I would choose (probably) the method with the most votes.  I suppose that with the poll sub-forum, it is ok to post such a limited-interest poll there <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 147 (members: 1, guests: 146)