Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="invitro" data-source="post: 151467" data-attributes="member: 446">Here is another idea I am comtemplating.  I might sometime, I don't know when but probably not soon, decide to make high scores on different tables be worth different amounts.  Like, a #10 score on a table whose top 100 scores include 40 of the top 100 players, would be worth more than a #10 score on a table with 15 of the top 100 players.I would do this using the IFPA method of valuing tournaments.  (So if doing this is a good idea, then it may add a plus to using IFPA's WPPR ranking points formula.)This would be a systematic way of doing something I've wanted to do anyway: make TotAN worth less, or maybe nothing at all.  And this method might help with the limit-to-23-tables rule, as tables on fewer platforms should have fewer top 100 players.  It would also make newer tables worth less, as fewer players have had the time to put a good run on them (should JY be worth the same as AFM?  I don't think so).Any thoughts on this?  <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />  The first thing to do would be to make a list of the number of top 100 players in the top 100 scores for each table, which I want to do anyway, and will probably do soon.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 146 (members: 0, guests: 146)