Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
Pinball Arcade Tables
Williams Tables - Retired Tables
Monster Bash (1998)
Ball has no weight at all
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shutyertrap" data-source="post: 28916" data-attributes="member: 134"><p>Personally I think FH has the best physics going. The bounce on the flippers just feels right. That being said, my first impressions of MB were that it had really good physics too. Now that I've played it a bit (and watched the PAPA tutorial), I do think that on the flippers it's too bouncy. Watching that vid I saw him catch the ball A LOT, where I'll get 3 or 4 bounces before it settles. Anyways, I think the weight on the ramps feels good, and is it me or do a lot of the shots feel the same as MM? I can hit creature using the same technique I use for catapult, and the 2 ramps feel about the same too.</p><p></p><p>This has become for me one of those tables I just pretty much flip live balls on. I do a little catching, but my timing while the ball is moving just seems better. Unlike CV, which I also play this way, I do feel like I have a bit more control. So weird how my play style changes due to the table. Despite me feeling they have a similar layout, when I play MM it's all catch and shoot and very little live ball play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shutyertrap, post: 28916, member: 134"] Personally I think FH has the best physics going. The bounce on the flippers just feels right. That being said, my first impressions of MB were that it had really good physics too. Now that I've played it a bit (and watched the PAPA tutorial), I do think that on the flippers it's too bouncy. Watching that vid I saw him catch the ball A LOT, where I'll get 3 or 4 bounces before it settles. Anyways, I think the weight on the ramps feels good, and is it me or do a lot of the shots feel the same as MM? I can hit creature using the same technique I use for catapult, and the 2 ramps feel about the same too. This has become for me one of those tables I just pretty much flip live balls on. I do a little catching, but my timing while the ball is moving just seems better. Unlike CV, which I also play this way, I do feel like I have a bit more control. So weird how my play style changes due to the table. Despite me feeling they have a similar layout, when I play MM it's all catch and shoot and very little live ball play. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
Pinball Arcade Tables
Williams Tables - Retired Tables
Monster Bash (1998)
Ball has no weight at all
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top