Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
The Pinball Arcade / Farsight Studios
Digital licensing laws need to be updated
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shutyertrap" data-source="post: 285180" data-attributes="member: 134"><p>Oh my god, it's like arguing with a flat earther.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, it is your arcade. You still have access to it. The only way it can be closed is if FarSight closes down their servers or you had all your purchases through Steam. You bought the arcade like a franchise, and FarSight delivered the product. Nobody new can franchise an arcade for themselves. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are completely off your rocker. Should Zen have then paid the exact same price for the license that FarSight did? Because there's no way in hell they would since an existing product has already flooded the market. Where would be the incentive? And what happens when SG sells their ownership of the license to another company? Do FarSight and Zen continue to have the license in perpetuity? Essentially they are then co-owners of the license, and the value of true ownership of the license would be diluted to the point a new buy wouldn't pay its true worth. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like hell they didn't. Zen and Magic Pixel both had digital pinball games on the market. The tables sold might have been different, but you better believe they were competing for the same customers. This has to be one of the silliest statements you've made so far. You're new to this forum, so I can forgive you not knowing this, but this very forum has been on FarSight's case to match the polish of Zen for years and years. There are probably any number of reasons why FarSight didn't correct certain things, but lack of competition wasn't one of them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think you'll find one license owner that would agree with you, digital or not. More to the point, and you've failed to answer on this, if you owned a license neither would you. You put something out there in perpetuity, the cat is out of the bag and you aren't ever getting control of it again. That would simply be the downfall of your company, because either people wouldn't do business with you at all, or people would take massive advantage of your 'generosity'.</p><p></p><p>Recognize you're on the wrong side of this one, as so far it's you and only you against heaps of other people here that recognize sound logic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shutyertrap, post: 285180, member: 134"] Oh my god, it's like arguing with a flat earther. Nope, it is your arcade. You still have access to it. The only way it can be closed is if FarSight closes down their servers or you had all your purchases through Steam. You bought the arcade like a franchise, and FarSight delivered the product. Nobody new can franchise an arcade for themselves. You are completely off your rocker. Should Zen have then paid the exact same price for the license that FarSight did? Because there's no way in hell they would since an existing product has already flooded the market. Where would be the incentive? And what happens when SG sells their ownership of the license to another company? Do FarSight and Zen continue to have the license in perpetuity? Essentially they are then co-owners of the license, and the value of true ownership of the license would be diluted to the point a new buy wouldn't pay its true worth. Like hell they didn't. Zen and Magic Pixel both had digital pinball games on the market. The tables sold might have been different, but you better believe they were competing for the same customers. This has to be one of the silliest statements you've made so far. You're new to this forum, so I can forgive you not knowing this, but this very forum has been on FarSight's case to match the polish of Zen for years and years. There are probably any number of reasons why FarSight didn't correct certain things, but lack of competition wasn't one of them. I don't think you'll find one license owner that would agree with you, digital or not. More to the point, and you've failed to answer on this, if you owned a license neither would you. You put something out there in perpetuity, the cat is out of the bag and you aren't ever getting control of it again. That would simply be the downfall of your company, because either people wouldn't do business with you at all, or people would take massive advantage of your 'generosity'. Recognize you're on the wrong side of this one, as so far it's you and only you against heaps of other people here that recognize sound logic. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
The Pinball Arcade / Farsight Studios
Digital licensing laws need to be updated
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top