Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="brakel" data-source="post: 76827" data-attributes="member: 416">I don't think that motion had anything to do with the Crave side of the business. The attorney that is listed as filing the motion is "trustee" which means that an attorney representing the bankruptcy court filed the motion as Fillpoint against The Price Pros. Fillpoint's main business was as an online fulfillment house. The Price Pros are an online retailer. I'm assuming that The Price Pros and Fillpoint had some business dealings that are being worked out.Dealing with a bankruptcy court is just plain strange. Basically the Fillpoint's creditors now own all the company with the court acting as the trustee. Crave's contract with FarSight could be worked out on Wednesday. Or it could be 6 months from now. It seems to me that FarSight should have been able to get out of their contract with Crave based on Crave's breech of contract by not publishing tables to Xbox. Perhaps FarSight can't afford the litigation that course of action would require. Or maybe Xbox wouldn't accept the breech of contract between the two parties without a court order. That's assuming that Microsoft assumes some kind of liability if it allowed someone else to publish for Crave. I don't know enough about publishing contract law to have an opinion on that aspect of the case.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 223 (members: 0, guests: 223)