Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bavelb" data-source="post: 28087" data-attributes="member: 358">I agree with the rose tinted glasses: I think the physics and simulation are very decent but altogether comparable to TPA (certainly not better). The ball feels a little too light, especially in lateral movement and bouncing of the table's items. Ball behaviour around the flippers feels a bit more accurate (although I havent had time to experiment with more than basic flipper technique).HOWEVER: it was great considering the time of inception and the calculations it had to work with. I do disagree with TPA players that claim pro pinball "had better physics and that was 10 years ago". Although I must say the physics are better than MM and CV. Ill certainly pledge at the 2 dollar amount so I can have some decent pinball on the laptop on the go.That said, digital pinball really could use a third company (ignoring the smaller app-developers). I'm just not sure the community can support a third one. Or let me rephrase: I think the community is big and eager enough the CAN support a third one once it pushes out products, I just don't think they can support the upfront costs of setting up that third one.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 100 (members: 0, guests: 100)