Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bowflex" data-source="post: 132105" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Yeah, I've followed it quite a bit.  In all fairness it sounds like they definitely knew they were sourcing wood that wasn't quite compliant with the lacey act but on the other hand the wood was not held up by the country of origin and it got into the US without any customs or inspections issues.  At that point they should be free and clear as far as I'm concerned.  Plus at this point it should be put to use or the wood goes to waste and then what was the point of "protecting" it?  Probably the most expensive wood they've ever paid for since they had to buy it twice.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 274 (members: 0, guests: 274)