Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sumez" data-source="post: 44942" data-attributes="member: 1547">I feel like I'm repeating myself, but as I'm reading it, what you guys are asking for is more realistic physics that better mimics the unpredictability of a real pinball table. And pulling that off in a proper way, is difficult, very difficult. Physics is already one of the most difficult things to program in a video game, and TPA already has some of the best pinball physics I've ever seen in a video game (I can only think of Zen Pinball that might be able to match it).I can't speak for FarSight, but I can only imagine that they are doing what they can. I can't imagine that they would cater so much to the casual audience that they would intentionally botch up their tables. After all, the table is modeled exactly after the real one, is it? Can you point out a "feature" that they added which feels like it's intentionally made to decrease the difficulty of the table? If so, at least address that directly instead of just saying "the table is too easy". It would make your argument a lot more valid, and I'm sure it would be a lot more helpful to FarSight, too.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 78 (members: 0, guests: 78)