Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="shutyertrap" data-source="post: 209432" data-attributes="member: 134">This is Disney we're talking about. They didn't even bat an eye when they lost over 250 million on John Carter. Making a mere pittance of dough on Indiana Jones pinball versus potentially showing a chink in the armor for that brand? Lego wasn't even all that successful with the license. Disney is all about marketing and ground swell. There's no reason to promote Indy, as there is no movie to tie it in with. I think even if they were willing to discuss terms, they'd view it as the wrong time for promotion. They look at a movie as a way to push merchandise, not the merchandise to push the movie. The reason you'll see a 3rd Cars movie is because the toys have sold over a billion dollars worth.So again, FarSight won't be doing Disney any favors with an Indy pin, but it'd be Disney doing them the favor as the profits from it would barely cover the lawyers fees.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 99 (members: 0, guests: 99)