Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
Pinball Arcade Tables
Unreleased Table Discussion & Requests
Licensed or Non-licensed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fuseball" data-source="post: 22259" data-attributes="member: 539"><p>So which do we prefer? Licensed or Non-Licensed game themes?</p><p></p><p>After the success of Addams Family, pretty much everything made by Bally/Williams from '93 to '95 was a licensed theme. Companies like Sega, Data East and Gottlieb/Premier ONLY made pinballs based on big name licenses. The same is true of Stern now.</p><p></p><p>I've always been quite ambivalent towards licensed games. With few exceptions (TZ, ST:TNG for example) I feel the license restricts the designer's ability to deliver the best game possible. The artwork is often horribly compromised (who would really want to look at the backglass of The Shadow, Johnny Mnemonic or Demolition Man for any length of time?) and the games often become quite humourless, with the creative decisions out of the designer's hands.</p><p></p><p>TZ and ST:TNG work so well because the theme is so loose, or at least not tied to such a strict narrative, that the game's design can be whatever the designer wants. The license acts as a creative springboard rather than a straitjacket.</p><p></p><p>Although pinball's popularity, and that of arcades generally, was on the decline from '95 onwards, I think the games that Williams produced from then until their demise were more creative, satisfying and visually appealing than almost all of the licensed titles that had preceded them for a couple of years. There's the artistic flair and eccentricity of J-Pop's flowing table designs, and the humour and approachability of Brian Eddy's AFM and MM for starters.</p><p></p><p>Pre-Addams Family the game designs and themes were also largely original, and it's those designs - games like Funhouse, Fish Tales and The Getaway that stick in the memory. Of course, most pinballs from the '80s were non-licensed themes, and even if the rulesets have dated, the playfield layouts and artwork are often inspired.</p><p></p><p>So... what does everyone else think? Are licensed games a good or a bad thing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fuseball, post: 22259, member: 539"] So which do we prefer? Licensed or Non-Licensed game themes? After the success of Addams Family, pretty much everything made by Bally/Williams from '93 to '95 was a licensed theme. Companies like Sega, Data East and Gottlieb/Premier ONLY made pinballs based on big name licenses. The same is true of Stern now. I've always been quite ambivalent towards licensed games. With few exceptions (TZ, ST:TNG for example) I feel the license restricts the designer's ability to deliver the best game possible. The artwork is often horribly compromised (who would really want to look at the backglass of The Shadow, Johnny Mnemonic or Demolition Man for any length of time?) and the games often become quite humourless, with the creative decisions out of the designer's hands. TZ and ST:TNG work so well because the theme is so loose, or at least not tied to such a strict narrative, that the game's design can be whatever the designer wants. The license acts as a creative springboard rather than a straitjacket. Although pinball's popularity, and that of arcades generally, was on the decline from '95 onwards, I think the games that Williams produced from then until their demise were more creative, satisfying and visually appealing than almost all of the licensed titles that had preceded them for a couple of years. There's the artistic flair and eccentricity of J-Pop's flowing table designs, and the humour and approachability of Brian Eddy's AFM and MM for starters. Pre-Addams Family the game designs and themes were also largely original, and it's those designs - games like Funhouse, Fish Tales and The Getaway that stick in the memory. Of course, most pinballs from the '80s were non-licensed themes, and even if the rulesets have dated, the playfield layouts and artwork are often inspired. So... what does everyone else think? Are licensed games a good or a bad thing? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
Pinball Arcade Tables
Unreleased Table Discussion & Requests
Licensed or Non-licensed?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
