Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pseudokings" data-source="post: 59706" data-attributes="member: 612">I always think that Safecracker looks like a really cool oddity to own in a big, impressive collection (like the one I hope to have some day when my dreams come true, and/or I win the lottery), but that the smaller playfield makes for more playfield congestion, and less fun shots, which is always #1 for me. Plus, it has only 1 dinky little ramp that seems to run into the back of the machine, and ramps are my fave 'playfield object'. If I was rich I'd pay the guy $6000 for his cherry one, sure, but I'd probably have bought 50-80 other pins first.The funny thing about all that is, I'm not sure it that makes it a better candidate for TPA (rare, unique table in pinball history, by a major designer, interesting), or a worse one (maybe a kinda weak play, a little hard to properly reproduce in the digital pinball/videogame environment).</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 111 (members: 0, guests: 111)