Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Slam23" data-source="post: 226101" data-attributes="member: 896"><p>If this is somehow still the best business model that they have or can sustain with the personnel and money they have, they won't have a reason to do things differently. Not to say that I'm happy with all those choices. I don't think they support older hardware just to be nice to some people for example, it probably also makes business sense.  I do feel that they are invested in quality, just that they don't prioritize it over producing new content. I would be perfectly happy if they would delay new table releases for a month, if that would mean a complete quality overhaul on lot's of tables (with known issues), main program (improve physics even more) and UI (have not seen the new one in detail, but here progress could be made). If they need the revenue of the monthly releases, that won't happen. We have also to keep in mind that we may not be the average TPA user, we could be the vocal minority of pinheads that will complain about things (on this forum) but still buy the tables anyway, whereas there also could be a bigger group of more casual players that maybe won't buy everything but keep interest in the app because of those monthly releases. Well, it's all conjecture anyway....</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 102 (members: 1, guests: 101)