Normal
It's not "common business sense".Common business sense would be to package tables in a way to maximize sales.Releasing a pack of tables that will only sell marginally is not "common business sense" a popular table and a less popular table is a much better idea.The majority of the feedback that I've seen is that usually the "less popular" of the tables ends up being very well received anyway. Take Big Shot/Scared Stiff for example. I bought the pack, played one game of Scared Stiff and then Big Shot (which I'd never played before ever) for the next 2 months almost exclusively.Quite frankly, if they change their entire business model every time someone complains about it they would have to change it every month and every release.It is my honest but not so humble opinion that if you skip a pack because you aren't excited about one of the tables, really it's your loss. The new tables are always increasing in quality and the revisited tables are always pleasant to revisit.
It's not "common business sense".
Common business sense would be to package tables in a way to maximize sales.
Releasing a pack of tables that will only sell marginally is not "common business sense" a popular table and a less popular table is a much better idea.
The majority of the feedback that I've seen is that usually the "less popular" of the tables ends up being very well received anyway. Take Big Shot/Scared Stiff for example. I bought the pack, played one game of Scared Stiff and then Big Shot (which I'd never played before ever) for the next 2 months almost exclusively.
Quite frankly, if they change their entire business model every time someone complains about it they would have to change it every month and every release.
It is my honest but not so humble opinion that if you skip a pack because you aren't excited about one of the tables, really it's your loss. The new tables are always increasing in quality and the revisited tables are always pleasant to revisit.
