Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="soundwave106" data-source="post: 256038" data-attributes="member: 3746">I'll echo that Orbiter is a novelty that is worth playing once and that's about it. There just isn't much to do on that table. Orbiter would've been a much better concept as a half-playfield or upper-level playfield or something along those lines.If we need something that would challenge Farsight's physics code, the mini playfields in Stern's Family Guy and/or Shrek would be a much better target. Those tables are probably too decently popular to be included on this thread though. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />Oddly enough, being that the I grew up on are the 90s DMDs that are well represented in TPA, the one table I would've thought of three years ago when this thread started <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> (No Fear) has in fact been done. I guess I would pick another emulation challenge, Revenge From Mars, since I do remember playing that a fair bit when it came out. I don't know about "least popular" but that machine seems to be polarizing; count me in the camp that enjoyed the game.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 648 (members: 0, guests: 648)