Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Other Talk
Poll Dancing
Time For a New Round of "Official" Polls?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="invitro" data-source="post: 138985" data-attributes="member: 446"><p>When I write "WMS", I mean Williams or Bally. Sorry, this was the common convention in the good old days. Maybe I should stop doing that.</p><p></p><p>"I think there is a limit to how many items can be listed in a poll (30 I think) so they had to be split somehow."</p><p></p><p>What about just splitting them randomly?</p><p></p><p>I would support this: identify 180 non-licensed tables. Use the IPDB and Pinside rankings as a start. Add the tables that have gotten the most support in polls here. I would require at least five EMs, but probably not any more. Then just split the 180 tables randomly into six polls of 30 machines. Have a final poll with the top five from each poll.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="invitro, post: 138985, member: 446"] When I write "WMS", I mean Williams or Bally. Sorry, this was the common convention in the good old days. Maybe I should stop doing that. "I think there is a limit to how many items can be listed in a poll (30 I think) so they had to be split somehow." What about just splitting them randomly? I would support this: identify 180 non-licensed tables. Use the IPDB and Pinside rankings as a start. Add the tables that have gotten the most support in polls here. I would require at least five EMs, but probably not any more. Then just split the 180 tables randomly into six polls of 30 machines. Have a final poll with the top five from each poll. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Other Talk
Poll Dancing
Time For a New Round of "Official" Polls?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
