Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Digital Pinball Games
Other Pinball Games
What's Better, TPA or VP?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SilverBalls" data-source="post: 224559" data-attributes="member: 340"><p>Hi Robert</p><p>I had a GTX480 (which is similar in performance to a 750 ti). I used to set the VP AA off and Amb Occlusion off and with nVidia FXAA set ON and I was I getting around 200fps on a heavy hitting tables using b2s too. I tended to limit frames to 120 to get smooth play. I never turned on VSync as that caused stuttery play for me. I just upgraded to a GTX 970 and am getting about 450-500 fps now, and can switch some other stuff on now in nVidia.</p><p></p><p>I am not sure why you get low fps like that- seems really low for your card/setup. Do you force VP10 to specific cores? I used to do this with VP9, but with VP10 I found it better not to do this - VP is definitely using multiple cores.</p><p></p><p>The tables I like are some of the EMs which look great darker. I tend to slide the lighting down. The modern tables I really like are Tommy, Star Trek 2013, Genesis, TX Sector. Rolling Stones looks great but the table becomes quite annoying. Rescue 911 looks pretty impressive too.</p><p></p><p>I took some FPSs before upgrading and here they are: GTX 480 1.5 GB vs GTX 970 4gb Gaming. I have an old Core i7 860 32-bit Win7 with 3.5 GB RAM.</p><p></p><p>Star Trek 2013 : 165 vs 480</p><p>Tommy : 215 vs 550</p><p>Rescue 911 : 150 vs 470</p><p></p><p>Might be worth seeing what you get with your setup for the above.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SilverBalls, post: 224559, member: 340"] Hi Robert I had a GTX480 (which is similar in performance to a 750 ti). I used to set the VP AA off and Amb Occlusion off and with nVidia FXAA set ON and I was I getting around 200fps on a heavy hitting tables using b2s too. I tended to limit frames to 120 to get smooth play. I never turned on VSync as that caused stuttery play for me. I just upgraded to a GTX 970 and am getting about 450-500 fps now, and can switch some other stuff on now in nVidia. I am not sure why you get low fps like that- seems really low for your card/setup. Do you force VP10 to specific cores? I used to do this with VP9, but with VP10 I found it better not to do this - VP is definitely using multiple cores. The tables I like are some of the EMs which look great darker. I tend to slide the lighting down. The modern tables I really like are Tommy, Star Trek 2013, Genesis, TX Sector. Rolling Stones looks great but the table becomes quite annoying. Rescue 911 looks pretty impressive too. I took some FPSs before upgrading and here they are: GTX 480 1.5 GB vs GTX 970 4gb Gaming. I have an old Core i7 860 32-bit Win7 with 3.5 GB RAM. Star Trek 2013 : 165 vs 480 Tommy : 215 vs 550 Rescue 911 : 150 vs 470 Might be worth seeing what you get with your setup for the above. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Digital Pinball Games
Other Pinball Games
What's Better, TPA or VP?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
