Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Pinball DB
Pinball Tables
Pinball Games
What's new
New posts
New articles
New profile posts
New article comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Welcome Back to Digital Pinball Fans -
please read this first
For latest updates, follow Digital Pinball Fans on
Facebook
and
Twitter
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
The Pinball Arcade / Farsight Studios
Why The Recent Emphasis On Licensed Tables?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Worf" data-source="post: 38530" data-attributes="member: 1047"><p>Probably because they were copies rather than designed. Williams had the same problemw with SWE1 - the table was designed for another game and retrofitted to Star Wars. Not the best ideas and if it wasn't a time pressure to release, they'd have re-done it properly from scratch.</p><p></p><p>The table has to be designed to fit the theme. You can't just take an existing table and try to come up with some theme to flow around it.</p><p></p><p>Also - well, it shows the subtleties of design - Steve Ritchie, Pat Lawlor - their work isn't just good design, but in adjusting the design to get good flow. On a real table, moving something 1/16" can change the game dramatically (either way more fun, or completely frustrating). (And we've seen it happen on TPA until FarSight re-adjusts the table. It's that finicky).</p><p></p><p>And even if the license makes no sense anymore, I'm sure the younger players will treat it as an "original" style table. Unless all the pinball players are old aging folks and thus the IPDB ratings never get modified anymore... in which case pinball's dying and there's no hope of rescuing it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Worf, post: 38530, member: 1047"] Probably because they were copies rather than designed. Williams had the same problemw with SWE1 - the table was designed for another game and retrofitted to Star Wars. Not the best ideas and if it wasn't a time pressure to release, they'd have re-done it properly from scratch. The table has to be designed to fit the theme. You can't just take an existing table and try to come up with some theme to flow around it. Also - well, it shows the subtleties of design - Steve Ritchie, Pat Lawlor - their work isn't just good design, but in adjusting the design to get good flow. On a real table, moving something 1/16" can change the game dramatically (either way more fun, or completely frustrating). (And we've seen it happen on TPA until FarSight re-adjusts the table. It's that finicky). And even if the license makes no sense anymore, I'm sure the younger players will treat it as an "original" style table. Unless all the pinball players are old aging folks and thus the IPDB ratings never get modified anymore... in which case pinball's dying and there's no hope of rescuing it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Home
Forums
Farsight Studios
The Pinball Arcade / Farsight Studios
Why The Recent Emphasis On Licensed Tables?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top