Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Striker" data-source="post: 273071" data-attributes="member: 6694">Never, ever underestimate the ego of a slighted business executive.  Maybe the Scientific Games exec was trying to gain leverage to squeeze more money out of a renewal. Also, keep in mind Scientific Games has not turned a profit since . . . as far back as I can tell, like 2013 or something.  Gobbling up the WMS/Bally IP was considering a smart move since IP usually can generate nice profits. Heck, they acquired rights to the James Bond franchise last year. In SG's case, however, this has not helped them get out of the red.  I think they also recently fired-and-hired another CEO, which seems to be a biennial occurrence at the company.  Not exactly the hallmarks of a well-run company.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 116 (members: 0, guests: 116)