I don't think a single person can be unanimous ;P Anyway, I think Earthshaker is different enough to Whirlwind to be worthy of inclusion first up ahead of the others. Having a more flowing layout makes it more different from WW than Diner is from Taxi, but opinions hey? Funny how they workEarthshaker is a lot like Whirlwind except with lack of Million+ Jackpots and a more flow-oriented layout. I played it in Pelham and can unanimously say that Whirlwind is much more exciting and fun.
I haven't watched them yet (probably should, would help me get a deeper appreciation for all tables) but it's probably Bowen Kerins doing the tutorials for those machines. If that's the case, then he's teaching people how to get the most out of them for tournament play. So yeah, that will likely mean hitting the same shots over and over :/Based on those vids, Cyclone actually looks interesting.
Whomever is playing those tables sure makes it look boring, going for one shot over and over.
Based on those vids, Cyclone actually looks interesting.
Whomever is playing those tables sure makes it look boring, going for one shot over and over.
exactly this, reminds me of Firepower which is just terrible, can't play more than few games on it.I voted for Diner. Cyclone seems fun but the artwork on the playfield will look like a nightmare in TPA.
Well the way this genuine poll is going "Diner" has all but won
Unless Failsight and his cronies comes up with a new ingenious plan lol
(although it was pretty close between it, diner and cyclone).