rehtroboi40
New member
- Oct 20, 2012
- 1,668
- 0
that would be the Wizard goal to end all Wizard goals
I dunno-we've already had some doozies.
Last edited:
that would be the Wizard goal to end all Wizard goals
LOTR is great but Simpsons will be next.
The only way I'd support a Simpsons kickstarter would be if it included both the 1990 Data East and the 2003 Stern tables.
Indiana Jones KS.
Actually Disney should pay farsight a decent sum to do a cool indy table recreation which may be able to compensate the image loss caused by the super ****ing ridiculous last movie and restore some faith for the francise.
The only way I'd support a Simpsons kickstarter would be if it included both the 1990 Data East and the 2003 Stern tables.
Whoa. There was another Indy film?
Those are good questions, but I haven't seen any definitive answers yet, just a lot of speculation.
I do believe that licenses expire after a while and have to be renegotiated. In other threads there was concern that Farsight would have to pull tables from earlier seasons if their licenses would expire. This didn't happen (yet) because they managed to renegotiate (as far as I understood that situation). I think if Stern decided to put out another batch of real LOTR machines, they probably don't have the rights anymore back from when they made the first run in 2003 and also would have to make a new deal. The best example of that scenario would be the recent re-run of Medieval Madness, only that does not concern an IP license.
I agree that Farstern's app would be a whole lot better with their back catalog in place,
Well, I believe that Stern will have much better luck getting licenses for its tables than Farsight has been on its own. That should be a substantial amount of good. I also think Farsight will have an easier time simulating SAM and/or Spike if Stern is helping them.What good would a, just announced, Stern app be if Stern and Farsight had to renegotiate licensing (from scratch) with older tables Stern already made? Again, now that FS and Stern are partners, they share assets, resources, etc...
It seems that not many PAF people think SPA will have anything older than about 2012, while I think it will have as much from 2003-2012 as 2012-present.
Well, I believe that Stern will have much better luck getting licenses for its tables than Farsight has been on its own. That should be a substantial amount of good. I also think Farsight will have an easier time simulating SAM and/or Spike if Stern is helping them.
It seems that not many PAF people think SPA will have anything older than about 2012, while I think it will have as much from 2003-2012 as 2012-present. Hmm, maybe another prediction contest to settle the issue?
Are these two different types of licenses? The Farsight talk was about the Williams/Bally license, while the Stern talk is about the non-pinball license?
I have a memory of reading something about the non-pinball licenses held by Stern in relation to the Iron Man Vault Edition (if I have that name correct). So maybe google "pinball license iron man vault" ...
You should call it SPA or Stern Pinball Arcade instead of "Farstern's app", since that's one of the few official things we know.
What we don't know is where "SPA" fits into Stern's business model. Is it for extra exposure to sell the new real machines? Or is it to pick up a few bucks from digital releases of their back catalogue?
I honestly don't know which (if either or both) approach would work. Stern themselves probably do have some decent idea, though.
The few bucks would be more than what they've gotten for what they've already done, which is sell Farsight the license to make their tables. Or, they have already allowed digital representations of their back catalog games for less than a few bucks, so certainly they would do so for a few bucks.Devil's advocate: Is there something to gain for Stern to do back catalog games digitally? They won't sell those real tables, so brand exposure is the best they get out of it (and maybe a few bucks as you said).