Normal
Just listened to the podcast.It was pretty interesting!The things I took from it (that haven't been discussed here already) -The Shadow gets mentioned,and Bobby thinks its an excellent table,so hopefully we will see this on TPA in the future...Also,the interviewer mentioned Star Trek - to which Mr. King said no,before talking about the fact that there are two other Star Trek tables,and one wasn't licensed. The IPDB has three Star Trek named pins (in addition to TNG). I've never played the Gottlieb unlicensed one and have no interest there. Also, Bally put one out in 1979 to coincide with the first Trek film.Again,never played,and not a lot of interest to me either.I rather liked the '94 Data East table though - based on the original series.It was easy,but it was also fun. That's one I would like to see,but I won't get my hopes up...Regardless,good news all around,and I look forward to the future of TPA.
Just listened to the podcast.It was pretty interesting!
The things I took from it (that haven't been discussed here already) -
The Shadow gets mentioned,and Bobby thinks its an excellent table,so hopefully we will see this on TPA in the future...
Also,the interviewer mentioned Star Trek - to which Mr. King said no,before talking about the fact that there are two other Star Trek tables,and one wasn't licensed. The IPDB has three Star Trek named pins (in addition to TNG). I've never played the Gottlieb unlicensed one and have no interest there. Also, Bally put one out in 1979 to coincide with the first Trek film.
Again,never played,and not a lot of interest to me either.
I rather liked the '94 Data East table though - based on the original series.It was easy,but it was also fun. That's one I would like to see,but I won't get my hopes up...
Regardless,good news all around,and I look forward to the future of TPA.
