kimkom
Member
- Jan 28, 2013
- 914
- 1
They're alienating so many gamers it's ridiculous. I'll probably be jumping ship.
Me too, I've been considering a move back to Sony next time.
Microsoft have opened the door and waved me through.
They're alienating so many gamers it's ridiculous. I'll probably be jumping ship.
yeah i'm not going for the xbox 1 either...d.m.
don't hate on the first xbox
*apologies if this is not suppose to be known to us*
Okay, so I had bookmarked the site that had the calendar of all the court hearings of the place where the case is being handled, and today they released the schedule for Wednesday. See the very bottom of the page: http://www.nynb.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Calendar/a-wednesday.pdf
I most definitely will be jumping ship from MS this time around. Not sure if I'll pick up a PS4 (weird, i've been a huge sony hater since dumping my PS1 for an N64) but the PS3 was a nice piece of hardware and both consoles had a lot to offer this time around.
I just don't like the Kinect always on crap. That's just creepy. The used game market is huge for me, so MS will no longer get my dollar. Goodbye XBOX,
Except there is: http://digitalpinballfans.com/showthread.php/4495-New-XBoxAgreed.
And I've been talking this way for about 6 months now. We've known this crap forever. Never doubt trusted rumors. Xbone anouncement was such a bust there's not even a thread about it here.
I don't think that motion had anything to do with the Crave side of the business. The attorney that is listed as filing the motion is "trustee" which means that an attorney representing the bankruptcy court filed the motion as Fillpoint against The Price Pros. Fillpoint's main business was as an online fulfillment house. The Price Pros are an online retailer. I'm assuming that The Price Pros and Fillpoint had some business dealings that are being worked out.
Dealing with a bankruptcy court is just plain strange. Basically the Fillpoint's creditors now own all the company with the court acting as the trustee. Crave's contract with FarSight could be worked out on Wednesday. Or it could be 6 months from now. It seems to me that FarSight should have been able to get out of their contract with Crave based on Crave's breech of contract by not publishing tables to Xbox. Perhaps FarSight can't afford the litigation that course of action would require. Or maybe Xbox wouldn't accept the breech of contract between the two parties without a court order. That's assuming that Microsoft assumes some kind of liability if it allowed someone else to publish for Crave. I don't know enough about publishing contract law to have an opinion on that aspect of the case.
But what's with the "paid for used"? PC gaming has no used games anymore - you can't sell your PC games and never could for a long time. At least without a serious amount of Steam fun (creating a new account for each game), at which point Valve could easily ban you as that's against the TOS for Steam. At least the consoles still make it an option. And most PC games are the same price as console titles now, so really...
You don't seem to understand how this works.If the Wii U were in the same place right now, I'd be more likely to believe it would be abandoned since sales have been weak so there is little upside. There are a TON of 360s out there. There is money to be made, so I'm sure they will try to make it.