I ask myself that every time I read a Gail r schwartz post. She is either seven years old, functionally retarded, or a troll. And I still can't decide which I'd place my wager on.
She (or it could be a he - Gail is also a male name, especially outside the U.S.) is probably not a native English speaker, or has the unfortunate habit of using texting language and sentence structure when she shouldn't, but calling her retarded is a bit too harsh.
I think its safe to assume that mission has failed.It's not just the poor sentence structure and typing style that I find off-putting. Once you battle through that and work to discern what is actually being said, the 'point' of the post is nearly always utterly insipid. And since I used the qualifier "functionally" (think "legally blind") I'm going to go ahead and stand by my original assessment in the hopes that it dissuades her from starting five new topics a day here going forward.