Is there any way to find this other than* scrolling through all the ranked scores? There are tens of thousands of them on most tables, and a few are in the hundreds of thousands, IIRC. Scrolling through 10 scores at a time would take a while... even if you could do 10 scores (a page) a second, it would take >2.5 hr to do a table with >100,000 scores. And "only" 17 minutes for a table with 10,000 scores.You can get a good idea of how well a table did by looking up the leaderboard standings (though, it may take a while). how many entries will give you the approximate number of downloads.
mysql> select table_id, t.abbr, min(rank), max(score), max(rank), min(score) from tpa_leaderboard l join tpa_table t on l.table_id=t.id where date='2015-05-06' group by table_id;
+----------+----------+-----------+----------------+-----------+------------+
| table_id | abbr | min(rank) | max(score) | max(rank) | min(score) |
+----------+----------+-----------+----------------+-----------+------------+
| 0 | TotAN | 1 | 76512635720 | 973060 | 922 |
| 1 | RBIoN | 1 | 37300267340 | 253292 | 0 |
| 2 | ToM | 1 | 14078474451920 | 257704 | 10050 |
| 3 | BH | 1 | 1549025135 | 66368 | 309 |
| 4 | BoP | 1 | 73712835670 | 103479 | 50000 |
| 5 | MM | 1 | 4540350587400 | 112893 | 15000 |
| 6 | CV | 1 | 3257841420 | 86943 | 69880 |
| 7 | FH | 1 | 3099025010 | 57614 | 195000 |
| 8 | MB | 1 | 41308269070 | 77722 | 65720 |
| 9 | Gorgar | 1 | 1672055480 | 74602 | 40 |
| 10 | CftBL | 1 | 312505443610 | 78715 | 1000000 |
| 11 | BK | 1 | 458512640 | 73791 | 100 |
| 12 | HD3E | 1 | 2689815940 | 72341 | 1775960 |
| 13 | Taxi | 1 | 168394480 | 71347 | 1000 |
| 14 | EatPM | 1 | 2550483880 | 73525 | 13010 |
| 15 | NGG | 1 | 91354241750 | 75738 | 30000 |
| 16 | BigShot | 1 | 193278500 | 71357 | 10 |
| 17 | SS | 1 | 72455767980 | 70239 | 5490 |
| 18 | TZ | 1 | 214795450970 | 81707 | 1089370 |
| 19 | STTNG | 1 | 1890199057550 | 87240 | 100000 |
| 20 | AFM | 1 | 979134836240 | 88586 | 85000 |
| 21 | Genie | 1 | 739001170 | 63244 | 5200 |
| 22 | DrDude | 1 | 681963180 | 28461 | 24450 |
| 23 | FirePwr | 1 | 627774000 | 26973 | 1000 |
| 24 | CC | 1 | 3203482110 | 31996 | 74280 |
| 25 | CentPark | 1 | 211080 | 27773 | 31 |
| 26 | WWater | 1 | 99934777050 | 32511 | 55000 |
| 27 | SpSh | 1 | 76844330 | 28194 | 2000 |
| 28 | Centaur | 1 | 234567890 | 27211 | 200 |
| 29 | Pin*Bot | 1 | 202119730 | 27329 | 1020 |
| 30 | CP | 1 | 5344700720 | 29240 | 50 |
| 31 | WWind | 1 | 488079650 | 27301 | 130120 |
| 32 | Flight2K | 1 | 15158160 | 20771 | 8000 |
| 33 | GoinNuts | 1 | 25272190 | 20106 | 10000 |
| 34 | T2 | 1 | 45714166080 | 39601 | 128080 |
| 35 | HH | 1 | 33017260 | 25476 | 5000 |
| 36 | TeedOff | 1 | 91139885780 | 23649 | 530000 |
| 37 | Co1812 | 1 | 47805292750 | 21412 | 20000 |
| 38 | Victory | 1 | 825849980 | 20852 | 700 |
| 39 | CBW | 1 | 26193524970 | 21061 | 500000 |
| 40 | ElDor | 1 | 360053650 | 18833 | 500 |
| 41 | FT | 1 | 9999658190 | 20265 | 71230 |
| 42 | BRose | 1 | 80073912020 | 19453 | 205210 |
| 43 | BK2K | 1 | 71200687840 | 15413 | 6020 |
| 44 | WD | 1 | 706269894190 | 17969 | 7144090 |
| 45 | HS | 1 | 281058310 | 15315 | 7000 |
| 46 | JY | 1 | 11135004350 | 17140 | 180410 |
| 47 | LCA | 1 | 2414679870 | 12341 | 5000 |
| 48 | HRC | 1 | 20424874000 | 14040 | 125000 |
| 49 | Diner | 1 | 73998483500 | 12708 | 75000 |
| 50 | BSD | 1 | 63150296660 | 16381 | 917170 |
| 51 | PotO | 1 | 1399999999 | 8716 | 44630 |
| 52 | PZone | 1 | 5321064690 | 6940 | 260230 |
| 53 | ES | 1 | 44600654370 | 6805 | 134000 |
| 54 | SST | 1 | 19999999990 | 6955 | 2219910 |
| 55 | TAF | 1 | 69394785960 | 17539 | 550010 |
| 56 | Cyclone | 1 | 58138650 | 4429 | 32060 |
| 57 | J*B | 1 | 173189263390 | 3689 | 155692150 |
+----------+----------+-----------+----------------+-----------+------------+
58 rows in set (0.22 sec)
Excellent question! I think it is indeed correct, unless scores on the monthly free table aren't eligible for the leaderboard, which seems very unlikely.Is it correct to add the denominator that some tables will have X amount of non-purchased leader-board additions because of the free table of the month?
Fantastic! Stupendous!Here's the results (again apologies for any bad formatting - sorted high to low):
That's a pretty steep drop off for season 4. I really find it hard to believe that 17% of TAF owners have TAF Gold though. And with a minimum buy in of $100 to get it, that means FarSight would have at least cleared $457,600 in the kickstarter! So these numbers don't tell the whole story.
The season 4 drop does look pretty steep. I wonder if the (real-life) S4 tables are on average less-notable than the S3 ones... they seem about the same to my eye.That's a pretty steep drop off for season 4. I really find it hard to believe that 17% of TAF owners have TAF Gold though. And with a minimum buy in of $100 to get it, that means FarSight would have at least cleared $457,600 in the kickstarter! So these numbers don't tell the whole story.
Also, there's that bug with the TotAN scores, where we believe that scores from other tables get marked as TotAN scores. I forgot this above ... Also, I can't remember if TotAN is the only free table, or if RBIoN and/or ToM is too.So these numbers don't tell the whole story.
Awesome! You're on a roll today Eldar. I think reason 2 is more likely to have a huge effect... just being available for a (much) lesser time will dampen the numbers. Was the S3 pass available on iOS at the same time as the other platforms?Part of the S4 drop-off is likely to have a couple of reasons:
1. Not all of S4 is available on PS3/4/Vita yet, so there may well be users of those systems holding off on getting S4 passes until then. (Of course the same goes for X360/XONE as well, but those scores don't contribute to the numbers I listed.)
2. iOS S4 passes weren't available until Safe Cracker was released, and there may be iOS users who are still holding off getting the pass. iOS is a pretty big chunk of the user base.
Was the S3 pass available on iOS at the same time as the other platforms?
There was a brief period where TAF Gold was accidentally available to a lot more folks than just the KS backers. So those scores may have come from then.
Also I think it was possible to gift TAF Gold codes to other users. The KS page lists 359 backers at $100+.
But 359 backers is a lot different from 4500 unique users. And no way did FarSight give away a couple of thousand codes. Look, I'm not saying there isn't truth in the numbers you've pulled, but clearly there are other factors in play too.