- Mar 17, 2012
- 4,293
- 0
Actually, make that 6 categories: I left out the Pinball 2000 tables.
Not true. Roger Sharpe set the record straight on this: it actually had a bright future, and Wizard Blocks, the next intended release, and Playboy, (which was also in development) utilized the technology in innovative ways. It was not a flop - "it was a success, just not a big enough success for a publicly traded company."I think we're better off just forgetting Pinball 2000!
There's a bar graph in that new Pinball Magazine that illustrates this...apparently RFM outsold all but 8 or 9 of the tables released in the previous 5 years. I was rather surprised; I had thought the Pinball 2000 tables were sales duds and got canned for that reason. Apparently not.Not true. Roger Sharpe set the record straight on this: it actually had a bright future, and Wizard Blocks, the next intended release, utilized the technology in innovative ways. It was also not a flop - "it was a success, just not a big enough success for a publically traded company."
Not true. Roger Sharpe set the record straight on this: it actually had a bright future, and Wizard Blocks, the next intended release, utilized the technology in innovative ways. It was also not a flop - "it was a success, just not a big enough success for a publically traded company."
Space Shuttle and Fireball it is.
Lol nah my money's on Popeye and Kiss Pinball
Actually, some of us do. Tables are grouped in 5 main categories for me: electromechanical, early solid-state, alphanumeric solid-state, DMD solid-state, and Wizard of Oz.
I have seen differentiation between early solid states, later solid states and DMDs for purposes of tournaments, which could be the source of the confusion. May I ask what the dividing line between early & later solid states is considered to be? I'm guessing that it isn't just the transition to alphanumeric displays, because otherwise, it would be a simple digital/alphanumeric divide and they would just call it that.