- Mar 14, 2012
- 7,334
- 0
No Good Gofers and Tee'd Off share a similar theme, but they play nothing alike. Presentation is one thing, but shouldn't how the games actually play be just as important (though I do feel Gofers is better, Tee'd Off is still good. I agree Gottlieb had crappy presentation for some Primer games. Raven and Genesis's backbox come to mind)? Transformers vs. Go Bots isn't a fair comparison because Go Bots suck and some Gottliebs still play well. I agree williams has better presentation for their SS games compared to 90s Gottlieb, but I still came back to Stargate and Silver Slugger despite this. It's interesting how Williams tried to make a classic style table with Harley Davidson becuase of Silver Slugger. I do feel Williams made better late 80s and 90s games, but I feel that some 80s and 90s Gottliebs are underrated (and I said some, not all). I agree gottlieb wasn't at its best in the Primer days, though.
Yes, gameplay should be important too, which is why I hate pretty much all Data East put out! Look, I make no bones about what I like, which is late '80s through '90s tables. I'll give Gottlieb this, their tables felt like solid construction. Flippers actually had power (again I aim my hate at Data East). But I do feel presentation is a huge component to my enjoyment of a table, as well as a rule set I can understand and have fun with. My problem with Stern tables these days is the rules are overly elaborate. They've got nice presentation, but I haven't a clue what's going on. It's almost like playing a Zen Pinball table!